Photography Information

The Truth About Pixels, Part 2-1: Printing 4x3 Inch Photos

Why is a 3 megapixel camera better than a 1 megapixel camera? It really depends on how you intend to reproduce the picture. The reason cameras produce pictures at 72 pixels per inch is that this format is standard in video uses such as television and DVD. So there is no noticeable difference in quality when viewing pictures on a TV or DVD. The difference appears when you are cropping and/or printing these pictures. If you are not familiar with the term cropping, I will explain it later. First, let's talk about printing.

Even the most inexpensive of printers these days are capable of printing at 300 dots per inch (dpi). Most are capable of printing at 600 dpi and you can buy relatively affordable printers that print at 1200 dpi and above. You may have noticed that with cameras it's called pixels per inch and with printers it is call dots per inch. The terms are hardware specific, but relate to the same principal. A printer prints a specific number of dots of ink per inch on the paper whereas a TV displays a specific number of pixels per inch on the screen. In either case, combining the dots or pixels creates the picture.

So how does this affect quality? If we're printing a picture that has 72 pixels per inch from a 1-megapixel camera on 4x3 printer paper we've got a problem. (Here is where I have to crunch some numbers, so please bear with me.) Let's figure it out. Four inches times 72 pixels (dots) per inch equals 288 pixels (dots) on the vertical line. Three inches times 72 pixels (dots) equals 216 pixels (dots) on the horizontal line. The total picture would have 288 times 216 or 62,208 pixels. That's way short of one million.

So where did the other pixels go? If you're printing this picture at a store or camera shop that has conversion capabilities, the machine that you are printing on actually crunches the picture down for you. The size of the picture taken by a 1-megapixel camera is approximately 16 inches x12 inches. (16x72=1152 and 12x72=864 and 864x1152=995,328 pixels). The machine makes this picture into a 4x3 by increasing the number of pixels per inch. The 4x3 picture is 1/4th the size of the 16x12 so there has to be four times as many pixels per inch to reduce this picture to 4x3. Four times seventy two equals two hundred eighty eight pixels (dots) per inch. With more pixels or dots per inch, the picture can be reproduced at a higher quality level making details sharper and more distinct. So a 1-megapixel camera can produce a reasonably good quality 4x3 inch picture on a 300 dpi printer. That's what most amateur photographers get with their snapshot cameras. If you try to get larger pictures, then the picture quality begins to deteriorate. Part 2-2 will deal with larger prints.

Conclusion: If you have a printer with more than 300 dpi capabilities and all you want is 4x3 inch prints, then you are not using all your printer's abilities. If you want prints larger than 4x3 inch, then you need a camera with a higher quality output capability. If all you want is 4x3 inch prints and video reproduction without cropping much, then a 1-megapixel camera and 300 dpi printer should serve you fine.

Note: Different printers produce different quality prints. Since this is a discussion of pixels and digital cameras, I do not get into choosing printers for the quality. Suffice it to say, if you have a reasonably good quality printer, then the information provided should work for you.

Note 2: There are ways to enlarge prints with lower dpi rates and size and still get quality results. This information will come in later discussions and is probably geared toward the more advanced photographers and digital dark room users.

Wayne Rockwell is a professional videographer at Legacy Pictures to Video and specializes in Video Montage creation and Photo Retouching.

This RSS feed URL is deprecated, please update. New URLs can be found in the footers at


Accessing the world of photography
Tara Miller sees the world through the diameter of a straw, but that doesn't stop her from capturing the exact moment when a new bride throws her bouquet into the wedding crowd. Miller is a legally blind commercial photographer in Winnipeg, Manitoba ...
This Photographer Deleted His Social Media with 1.5 Million FollowersPetaPixel (blog)
World's Best Single Images Revealed by the 2018 Sony World Photography AwardsMy Modern Met
Cultures resonate in 2018 Sony World Photography AwardsMother Nature Network (blog)
Yahoo News UK
all 14 news articles »


At MoMA, Photography Doesn't Have to Reinvent Itself to Be Radical
The annual survey of cutting-edge imagemakers is back in New York. It shows that even traditional uses of the medium can still be revelatory.
Discover 5 Artists Breathing New Life Into Photography in MoMA's ...artnet News

all 2 news articles »


Five Tips to Truly Improve Your Photography
These aren't quick tips about a neat technique or trick. These five tips are for anyone who is in photography for the long haul, whether you're a passionate amateur or looking to make it your career. Coming to you from former Fstoppers Photographer of ...


How Armenians Helped Develop Photography in the Ottoman Empire and Beyond
Continuity and Rupture: An Armenian Family Odyssey features thousands of photographs and glass negatives taken by members of the Dildilian Family from the 1870s through their exile in 1922 and resettlement in Greece, France, and the US. Accompanied by ...

Photography exhibit featured at Carl Junction chamber
Joplin Globe
A monthlong photography exhibit at the Carl Junction Area Chamber of Commerce, 205 N. Main St., will showcase a continually evolving display of photography. The Endless Art Photography Exhibit will allow visitors to purchase pieces of artwork during ...


2018 Sony World Photography Awards: Open winners announced
The World Photography Awards is now in its 11th year, with the aim of the awards being to recognize the very best contemporary photography captured over the last year. Sponsored by Sony, the awards incorporate four competitions – Professional (10 ...
Sony World Photography Award winners 2018
American photographer Richard Frishman captures two prizes in 2018 Sony World Photography Awardsimaging resource
Winning shots of the 2018 Sony World Photography Awards | Daily ...Daily Mail
Camera Jabber (press release) (blog)
all 24 news articles »

Food & Wine

Want Dreamy Instagram Photos? These Food Photography Retreats Are Calling Your Name
Food & Wine
In previous eras, food bloggers and photographers often learned to navigate their emerging field on their own, stumbling into it by way of adjacent professions or passions. Many food writers learned to photograph their dishes through trial and error ...

Artscape: Charles Leche finds his happy medium through photography
Charles Leche claims he lacks any ability to paint, draw or sculpt. But what he can do with a camera is something different entirely. His talent in bringing architecture, animals, cultural activities and more to life is now on display in "Photography ...

The 2018 Scotiabank Photography Award reveals its shortlist
Markets Insider
As one of Canada's largest and most prestigious lens-based art awards, the Scotiabank Photography Award aims to recognize the achievements of established mid-to-late-career photo-based artists, and the contributions they have made to art and ...

and more »

Peter Funch Sees the Patterns in the People on the Street
New York Times
These photographs were made by the Danish artist Peter Funch, and they are part of a series of many such pairs. For nine years, from 2007 until 2016, Funch hung around Grand Central Terminal and watched commuters during the morning rush between 8:30 ...

Google News

home | site map | Seashell Photography
© 2006