Photography Information

The Truth About Pixels, Part 2-1: Printing 4x3 Inch Photos


Why is a 3 megapixel camera better than a 1 megapixel camera? It really depends on how you intend to reproduce the picture. The reason cameras produce pictures at 72 pixels per inch is that this format is standard in video uses such as television and DVD. So there is no noticeable difference in quality when viewing pictures on a TV or DVD. The difference appears when you are cropping and/or printing these pictures. If you are not familiar with the term cropping, I will explain it later. First, let's talk about printing.

Even the most inexpensive of printers these days are capable of printing at 300 dots per inch (dpi). Most are capable of printing at 600 dpi and you can buy relatively affordable printers that print at 1200 dpi and above. You may have noticed that with cameras it's called pixels per inch and with printers it is call dots per inch. The terms are hardware specific, but relate to the same principal. A printer prints a specific number of dots of ink per inch on the paper whereas a TV displays a specific number of pixels per inch on the screen. In either case, combining the dots or pixels creates the picture.

So how does this affect quality? If we're printing a picture that has 72 pixels per inch from a 1-megapixel camera on 4x3 printer paper we've got a problem. (Here is where I have to crunch some numbers, so please bear with me.) Let's figure it out. Four inches times 72 pixels (dots) per inch equals 288 pixels (dots) on the vertical line. Three inches times 72 pixels (dots) equals 216 pixels (dots) on the horizontal line. The total picture would have 288 times 216 or 62,208 pixels. That's way short of one million.

So where did the other pixels go? If you're printing this picture at a store or camera shop that has conversion capabilities, the machine that you are printing on actually crunches the picture down for you. The size of the picture taken by a 1-megapixel camera is approximately 16 inches x12 inches. (16x72=1152 and 12x72=864 and 864x1152=995,328 pixels). The machine makes this picture into a 4x3 by increasing the number of pixels per inch. The 4x3 picture is 1/4th the size of the 16x12 so there has to be four times as many pixels per inch to reduce this picture to 4x3. Four times seventy two equals two hundred eighty eight pixels (dots) per inch. With more pixels or dots per inch, the picture can be reproduced at a higher quality level making details sharper and more distinct. So a 1-megapixel camera can produce a reasonably good quality 4x3 inch picture on a 300 dpi printer. That's what most amateur photographers get with their snapshot cameras. If you try to get larger pictures, then the picture quality begins to deteriorate. Part 2-2 will deal with larger prints.

Conclusion: If you have a printer with more than 300 dpi capabilities and all you want is 4x3 inch prints, then you are not using all your printer's abilities. If you want prints larger than 4x3 inch, then you need a camera with a higher quality output capability. If all you want is 4x3 inch prints and video reproduction without cropping much, then a 1-megapixel camera and 300 dpi printer should serve you fine.

Note: Different printers produce different quality prints. Since this is a discussion of pixels and digital cameras, I do not get into choosing printers for the quality. Suffice it to say, if you have a reasonably good quality printer, then the information provided should work for you.

Note 2: There are ways to enlarge prints with lower dpi rates and size and still get quality results. This information will come in later discussions and is probably geared toward the more advanced photographers and digital dark room users.

Wayne Rockwell is a professional videographer at Legacy Pictures to Video and specializes in Video Montage creation and Photo Retouching.


MORE RESOURCES:
This RSS feed URL is deprecated, please update. New URLs can be found in the footers at https://news.google.com/news


New York Times

At Arles Festival, 7 Promising Photographers to Watch
New York Times
These are a few of the questions raised by photographers from places including China, France, Poland, Switzerland and Turkey whose works are on display at the Rencontres d'Arles photography festival, which runs through Sept. 23. These are edited ...




9to5Mac

These are the winners of the 11th annual iPhone Photography Awards [Gallery]
9to5Mac
The annual iPhone Photography Awards have recognized the best images taken with the iPhone over the last 11 years, and now the winners of this year have been unveiled. As revealed on the IPPA website, this year's winners were selected from “thousands ...
Apple CEO Tim Cook Congratulates 2018 iPhone Photography Award WinnersMac Rumors
See photos from this year's 11th annual iPhone Photography AwardsAppleInsider

all 5 news articles »


Fstoppers

Amazon's Second-Best-Selling Photography Book Is Now Available for Free Download
Fstoppers
The second-best-selling photography book of all time in the “Digital Photography” section of Amazon has been made available for free download by its authors, who are currently celebrating reaching one million subscribers on YouTube. Photographers Tony ...



Fstoppers

Get a New Perspective on Aerial Photography With a 360-Degree Camera
Fstoppers
Drones have given us an entirely new perspective in photography and videography but, of course, they aren't the final frontier. This video from PhotoshopCAFE offers a different take on aerial photography and shows you how to do it. Host Colin Smith ...



Refinery29

This Collaboration Means You Can Soon Get Fine Art Photography For Ikea Prices
Refinery29
If you've always been interested in incorporating photography into your home decor but have never been sure where to start (or felt intimidated by what are typically high prices), beginning with photos curated by a camera brand and a beloved home goods ...

and more »



PetaPixel (blog)

This Best-Selling Digital Photography Book is Free Right Now
PetaPixel (blog)
How to Create Stunning Digital Photography ordinarily costs $20 as a paperback and $10 as an eBook. On Amazon, it's a 5/5-star book with over 2,200 reviews, and it's ranked as the #2 bestseller in the categories Digital Photography and Digital Audio ...



Fstoppers

Talent, Not Tools, Will Determine the Quality of Your Photography
Fstoppers
Today, I state the obvious. But sometimes even the most obvious things can be easy to forget. I got an email yesterday from a talented young photographer. The aspiring professional asked a very logical question, one that I myself would've asked when I ...



WZTV

FERRIER FILES: A dangerous game: Abandoned building photography
WZTV
That is a type of wedding photographer who captures very few posed photos. He is looking for moments. The natural emotion of the day. What most people don't know is that there is another side to Jay Farrell's photography, a temptation he can't resist.


Google News

home | site map | Seashell Photography
© 2006