Science Information

Aerospace Design Thoughts, The Bionic Man, and The Future of Design


Not all aircraft have wings, for instance NASA's Steve Austin Bionic Man series style lifting bodies. Introduction to this thought process can be provided by a quick view of this site;

http://www.dfrc.nasa.gov/History/Publications/LiftingBodies/source.html

On a planet such as Mars where the winds are extremely high such as 200 knots but the atmosphere is not very dense you would not need wings. This web site is interesting and worth reading;

http://www.dfrc.nasa.gov/History/Publications/LiftingBodies/contents.html

Once you reach a certain speed are you really flying in air or did the shock wave move all the air away and you are now riding the wave itself?

http://aerodyn.org/Wings/waverider.html

And if you are riding the wave or in the wave how can you create a wave ahead of the plane at slow speeds so you can accelerate without the friction of the air at low altitudes? And how do you test this in a wind tunnel? Make the air move past the model at speeds of mach 6 or more? Not. And how can you send a wave out in front of the plane to create an out going wave, which can return or stay with the aircraft at its relative speed? And what the hell do you do if the aircraft suddenly falls back into real air all at once? If you create a tube of none air from a pulsating energy mass out ward from the plane, how can you be sure the aircraft can pull it's self at a rate fast enough to stay in the wake of the wave? Can you send out ion charged beams, which will pull the aircraft within the tube created by the beam that has diminished the air in front of the aircraft without causing the aircraft to turn side ways if it brushes up against the sidewalls of the non air tube created? Perhaps the original aircraft and the original thoughts of flying and aerodynamics miss the real picture? After all it was long ago and look at all the different combinations thus far created from the Wright Brothers to the JSF? Just think of all the wacky design contests and back to the drawing board ideas that occur when we dump what we believe is the total limits of all of mathematics, aerospace and known physics? There are those who want to steal the data from other species and are on a mission to find out new methods from future friends? There is a whole contingency of reverse engineering aerospace engineers who have put a lot of imagination to the graph paper.

So much goes into new ideas and theories. Feasible in the literal sense? Of course, and we are seeing so many different combos and ideas that even Burt Rutan cannot keep up. If you look at some of his best designs you will see that some have no tails, no emphages, no fuselages, etc. Look at some of Jack Northrop's Designs? His flying wings, looks very similar to the modern B-2 Bomber doesn't it? Yesterdays ideas and plans are today's greatest achievements.

Lesson here? Never stop dreaming and thinking, question everything and never stop believing, anything is possible that is the only guarantee. The Germans in WWII had some break through designs with their Henkel and even the Komet fighter interceptor. Some of which ended up in the hands of American Aerospace engineers who for decades perfected the designs. Mankind is not too dissimilar to the hundredth monkey in that regard. They copy us and we copy them and later in the Century it was the Russians and US copying each other building the F-15 and the Foxbat. The Mig 29 and others. What have we learned? At each step we have learned so much. And are we finished now? No way. Are we done with our advancement? No. This is only beginning as we find that we are running out of ways to increase performance of the aircraft we are changing the air itself and why not? Why think inside the box?

Then we have the X-36 and other hypersonic thoughts and models and tests and whooaaa, where do we go from here? What about the spacecraft can we fly them in the atmosphere too? A little on air, but what about after we take the air away? Can we then fly them near the Earth's Surface but minus the air? Perhaps? Can we fly these craft here and now? Land and take them off of runways? And do you really think we are the only ones with Space Shuttle, re-entry designs? Let us think about this for a second? Yes of course the Brits too and the Russians and just in case you thought people are not working on making this stuff a reality check is needed, because not only are they working on this stuff as we speak they are flying them too. Then there are the secret stuff now being made like the Aurora and the TR-3 B Black triangle once again proving that if your limit your mind you cannot expand your horizon.

Natural Laws and physics dictate flight right? Yes, of course, however have you considered how to change the natural laws for split second needed to change the physics in our known flight characteristics? So we know what air is right and how an aircraft's characteristics comply with natural known laws within what we call Air and we know about thrust, drag, relative wind/lift and gravity. But when you are void of air and when you transition to space everything changes in what we think we know. And this may explain some of the thoughts on UFO travels. Of course this abstract thought is way ahead of most countries, which are still thinking of entering space.

Look at the X-Prize and free enterprise trying out all the new designs. We already have the engines and they work fine and have been tested again and again. No, we are not the only ones with this technology. Other nations are pushing the envelope too, spending money in R and D and taking the risks, which are associated with success and failure. No matter what you think of all this new high tech aerodynamic thought, it shows one thing; The human spirit is alive and well and we will boldly go where no man has gone before and come back to tell about it. Hey all this is possible right now. So let's do it.

"Lance Winslow" - If you have innovative thoughts and unique perspectives, come think with Lance; www.WorldThinkTank.net/wttbbs


MORE RESOURCES:
This RSS feed URL is deprecated, please update. New URLs can be found in the footers at https://news.google.com/news


USA TODAY

'Transgender,' 'fetus,' 'science-based' reportedly on CDC list of banned words
USA TODAY
Now the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reportedly has seven terms that can't appear in official documents. The Washington Post is reporting the Trump administration is banning the federal health agency from using seven words or phrases in ...
CDC barred from using terms like 'science-based' in budget docsEngadget
CDC banned from using 'evidence-based' and 'science-based' in official documents: reportThe Hill
CDC banned from using 7 words, including “science-based,” in budget documentsVox
Telegraph.co.uk -FOX31 Denver -Voice of America
all 175 news articles »


The Verge

A century after Arthur C. Clarke's birth, science fiction is still following his lead
The Verge
At some point, most science fiction readers come across the “Big Three” authors from its so-called Golden Age: Robert A. Heinlein, Isaac Asimov, and Arthur C. Clarke. Over the course of his lifetime, Clarke witnessed the birth of the space age, and ...

and more »


The New York Review of Books

Mark Dion: The Science of Art
The New York Review of Books
It appears to be an artist's work station, but with a naturalist's focus: pencils, markers, and paints are positioned across the desk; a row of books includes such titles as Animal Invaders, Fire Ants, and Snakehead, while watercolors pinned to two ...



Science Magazine

Researchers win some, lose some in final US tax bill
Science Magazine
The release yesterday of the final version of the Republican-backed bill marks the end of a fierce but remarkably brief battle over the biggest rewrite of the U.S. tax code in decades. Both the U.S. House of Representatives and the Senate passed ...
The GOP tax plan would blow a hole in American scienceVox

all 3,627 news articles »


Science Magazine

Trump team puts controversial 'red team' challenge to climate science 'on hold'
Science Magazine
The effort by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to publicly debate mainstream climate science is on ice. The idea of a "red team, blue team" debate to critique climate science — championed by EPA boss Scott Pruitt — has created divisions ...

and more »


The Verge

This collection features images from one of science's most influential explorers
The Verge
Born in 1769, von Humboldt was a scholar and explorer who traveled the world studying geography and biology. An early advocate for scientific thought and reasoning, his observations were critical in the field of biogeography and helped establish the ...



Forbes

Nicole Marie Stott Bridges Science, Art And Healing
Forbes
For retired astronaut Nicole Marie Stott, a stay on the International Space Station gave her more than the thrill of a lifetime, it re-inspired her love of painting. Stott first joined NASA's Kennedy Space Center in 1988 working in the Orbiter ...



The Hindu

When science textbooks become graphic novels
The Hindu
It doesn't take a lot to make the average science textbook more interesting. One of the many ways in which pure science textbooks are made more user-friendly is by using comic book elements, with characters explaining different concepts. Now a Pune ...



Here's What The Science Says About Why We Get Déjà Vu
ScienceAlert
Here's What The Science Says About Why We Get Déjà Vu. This looks familiar. LINDSAY DODGSON, BUSINESS INSIDER. 16 DEC 2017. It's one of the oddest sensations. That feeling where you are in a new situation, or a completely new environment, but you get ...



Astronomy Magazine

The LSST and big data science
Astronomy Magazine
Data complied into scheduled science releases will get considerable reprocessing to ensure that all contents are consistent, that false detections are filtered and that faint signal sources are confirmed. Reprocessing will also classify objects using ...


Google News

home | site map | Xray Photography
© 2006